Skip to Main Content

ARC:Anti-Black Racism and Child Welfare

Information, links, and resources related to anti-Black racism in child welfare and achieving equity for African Canadian children, youth, and families

Anti-Black racism in Ontario child welfare

Like other Canadian institutions, child welfare has evolved within a historical context of anti-Black racism.  

Anti-Black racism has been woven into the fabric of child welfare. The result is oppressive policies, biased discretionary practice, and a lack of appropriate and culturally safe service responses by child welfare professionals when working with African Canadian children, youth, and families – all of which contributes to long-standing disproportionalities and disparities for African Canadian communities. 

In the child welfare context, disproportionality is commonly understood as the overrepresentation of certain groups in child welfare relative to their proportion in the general population. In 2018, a report by the Ontario Human Rights Commission found the proportion of African Canadian children admitted into care to be 2.2 times higher than their proportion in the child population.

In the child welfare context, disparity refers to how certain groups experience child welfare relative to other groups. Disparities can manifest in various ways, including within decision-making stages as more intrusive forms of interventions; higher rates of disproportionality; less access to appropriate services; and poorer outcomes. Issues in Ontario reflect the issues raised by African Americans throughout the United States, with children more likely to be referred to a Children's Aid Society by educators, police, and medical professionals; more likely to be removed from their homes; less likely to be returned to their families; and more likely to grow up in foster care without being adopted or finding another permanent home. According to an information sheet based on OIS-2013 data, in comparison to white children, African Canadian children in Ontario are 40% more likely to be investigated, 18% more likely to be substantiated, 8% more likely to be transferred to ongoing services, and 13% more likely to be placed in out-of-home care during the investigation.

Resources