Ontario research demonstrates that in 97% of child welfare investigations, children and youth remain at home with their families. Of the 3% of investigations resulting in a change of residence for children and youth, most are placed in kinship service or customary care (2% of investigations), and fewer are placed in kinship care or other placement types (1% of investigations).
Five-year trends in child welfare data show:
These trends fit with child welfare redesign, improvements with family search and engagement, the child welfare sector's 9 Reconciliation Commitments, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s Calls to Action, the One Vision One Voice Race Equity Practices, and legislative obligations.
Data tells us that Indigenous, racialized, and 2SLGBTQ+ children and youth continue to be overrepresented in foster care, requiring the sector to explore systemic racism and oppression and the role it plays in all aspects of the Ontario child welfare system, including placement decisions.
The following sections of the guide offer research conducted by and evaluated by members of the child welfare sector, both within Canada and outside of the Canadian context.
Research shows that broad kin networks are directly linked to better outcomes and positively contribute to the well-being of children and youth in the child welfare system.
Research from Casey Family Programs, the Child Welfare Information Gateway, and another study cites the benefits of kinship placements over other out-of-home care arrangements, including:
Other research conducted speaks on the benefits of kinship placements, such as the following: a research summary of a systemic review of kinship care found that, based on high strength evidence, kinship care shows a positive effect on placement stability as there is a significant link between being placed in kinship care and having fewer placements and less placement disruption.
Similarly, research conducted by PART explores the myths and evidence pertaining to kinship to build awareness of implicit bias in placement decision-making.
Lastly, longitudinal research shows the historical development of kinship care, research on kinship care, and how family life and relations are negotiated and lived in the span between private and public sphere. It includes the perspectives of the children, their parents, and their relatives.
Note: you have to be authenticated by OACAS’s library databases to access any EBSCO articles. To learn how to be authenticated, you can visit the EBSCOHost research databases guide. If you are an OACAS member and are having difficulty accessing these articles, please reach out to Jessica Mariano, Content & Research Librarian (she/her).
“Customary care is an inherent right and practice that predates the evolution of child welfare on Turtle Island
and supersedes jurisdiction. Indigenous worldviews see children and youth at the centre of circles of care.
Our collective work is to prioritize and build meaningful relationships with families, communities, and nations,
honoring them as the experts in kinship and alternate care.”
– Julia Jamieson, FNIM Holistic Practice Director, OACAS
“The community is a positive social support that promotes healthy coping strategies, endorses cultural connections,
and creates a protective factor against the harmful impacts of anti-Black racism.”
– Keishia Facey, OVOV Program Manager, OACAS
“Family acceptance and support is the number one protective factor for 2SLGBTQ+ youth when it
comes to their mental health, well-being, and positive outcomes. Providing a home which affirms the
sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression of a youth can be lifesaving!”
– Kristin Roe, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Lead, OACAS; Jacob Stokl, 2SLGBTQ+ Analyst, OACAS